The layer takes the latest bars and searches the coin's history for segments where the price moved similarly and volume changed the same way. The segment found is overlaid on the latest candles and continued to the right, showing where the price went back then. At the bottom: how many of the found continuations went up and how many went down. We deliberately do not show a similarity percentage: our check showed the matches are no better than random; a shuffled sample finds just as many "similar" ones.
Similar segments are found by our search through the coin's history on higher timeframes. We deliberately do not show a similarity percentage.

This layer has no "how it is read" patterns: it is an observation, not a forecast, and we do not suggest reading the future from it. It is used to recall how the market behaved in a similar setting and to test your own idea on past segments, nothing more.
No pattern works every time: a similar segment explains what has happened better than it tells what will happen.
The terminal searches the coin's history for stretches shaped like the latest bars and shows what came after each. The navigator at the bottom of the chart: “Similar stretch 2 of 7”, its date and what happened next; ◀ ▶ arrows or the ← → keys. By default only the selected stretch is visible; the rest can be shown in the background.
There is no similarity percentage on purpose: a shuffled shape, which has no shape at all, finds just as many “similar” stretches with the same percentage. A five-year check found that analogs predict no better than random stretches. It is a way to see the spread, not a forecast. Works on the higher timeframes — from four hours up to a week.
The terminal searches the coin's history for stretches shaped like the latest bars and shows what came after each. The navigator at the bottom of the chart: “Similar stretch 2 of 7”, its date and what happened next; ◀ ▶ arrows or a swipe over the navigator. By default only the selected stretch is visible; the rest can be shown in the background.
There is no similarity percentage on purpose: a shuffled shape, which has no shape at all, finds just as many “similar” stretches with the same percentage. A five-year check found that analogs predict no better than random stretches. It is a way to see the spread, not a forecast. Works on the higher timeframes — from four hours up to a week.